Reason Magazine
•From Daphne Keller (Stanford) on the Tiktok Case
Summary
Nutrition label
57% Informative
Supreme Court rules solely based on national security threat posed by Chinese data collection, not the algorithmic control issue.
Just last summer , Justice Alito seemed to think that algorithmic ranking of user content wasn't speech.
Overall, the per curiam opinion and concurrences barely mention user rights at all, which is exactly how I want it.
VR Score
74
Informative language
82
Neutral language
12
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources