Guardian
•Why Kamala Harris couldn’t convince an anti-establishment America | Samuel Hammond
Summary
Nutrition label
72% Informative
Kamala Harris was a bad candidate, but more than any individual, this election was a referendum on America ’s incumbent political establishment.
The backlash against the establishment is being driven by two longer-term structural trends, writes Samuel Hammond Hammond .
Hammond: The internet-era rewards politicians with a degree of unfiltered authenticity.
VR Score
75
Informative language
73
Neutral language
25
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
62
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
7
https://nationalaffairs.com/publications/detail/the-future-is-factionhttps://www.nytimes.com/2024/11/09/opinion/ezra-klein-podcast-patrick-ruffini.htmlhttps://www.discoursemagazine.com/p/the-fifth-wave-is-the-medium-really-the-messagehttps://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/campaigns/presidential/3222249/how-kamala-harris-plowed-through-1-billion/https://www.reuters.com/world/us/trumps-return-power-fueled-by-hispanic-working-class-voter-support-2024-11-06/https://www.tabletmag.com/sections/news/articles/brokenism-alana-newhousehttps://press.stripe.com/the-revolt-of-the-public
Source diversity
7
Affiliate links
no affiliate links