logo
welcome
Reason Magazine

Reason Magazine

Court: CNN's coverage of Twitter's suspension of Veritas is not defamation

Reason Magazine
Summary
Nutrition label

57% Informative

Eleventh Circuit decision in Project Veritas v. CNN involves CNN 's coverage of Twitter 's suspension of Project .

CNN suggested on-air on February 15 that Twitter suspended Veritas 's account for "promoting misinformation" But CNN falsely accused Veritas of violating a completely different policy—spreading misinformation.

The court says Veritas adequately alleged "actual malice," to say "her statements were false".

Project Veritas says CNN knew that the true reason for Veritas 's suspension from Twitter was the posting of private information.

But CNN reported four days later on-air that Veritas had been suspended in relation to a crackdown on the spreading of misinformation.

CNN contends that the article and Cabrera 's tweet are not sufficient evidence of actual malice because they do not demonstrate that Cabrera "doubted her statement".

VR Score

65

Informative language

70

Neutral language

18

Article tone

semi-formal

Language

English

Language complexity

71

Offensive language

possibly offensive

Hate speech

not hateful

Attention-grabbing headline

detected

Known propaganda techniques

detected

Time-value

short-lived

Source diversity

1

Read full article