Planned Parenthood's Medicaid Funding Case
This is a South Carolina news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Henry McMaster news.
South Carolina news
For more South Carolina news, you can click here:
more South Carolina newsHenry McMaster news
For more Henry McMaster news, you can click here:
more Henry McMaster newsNews about SCOTUS
For more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
Planned Parenthood South Atlantic. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest abortion providers news, Planned Parenthood news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
other abortion providersWashington Examiner
•US Politics
US Politics
Planned Parenthood braces for Supreme Court fight over Medicaid funding
80% Informative
The Supreme Court will hear Medina v. Planned Parenthood South Atlantic on April 2 .
The case could determine whether states can prohibit all state Medicaid funds from going toward Planned Parenthood and other abortion providers.
South Carolina Gov. Henry McMaster ordered the state to deem abortion providers unqualified for Medicaid reimbursements for family planning services.
South Carolina argues that the Medicaid statute does not create an enforceable individual right.
The state says letting patients sue under Section 1983 would undermine states’ discretion.
Supporters of Planned Parenthood argue that the law’s plain text supports patient choice.
A ruling for South Carolina could open the floodgates for other Republican -led states to take similar action.
The White House is reviewing active Title X family planning grants and could decide to revoke funds from health clinics , including Planned Parenthood affiliates across the country.
The measure is being considered in part because abortion is less expensive than labor and delivery costs.
The outcome could leave Planned Parenthood scrambling to maintain services in red and purple states alike.
VR Score
80
Informative language
77
Neutral language
62
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
65
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
17
Source diversity
9
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
Small business owner?