This is a news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to David Gergen news.
For more David Gergen news, you can click here:
more David Gergen newsFor more SCOTUS news, you can click here:
more SCOTUS newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about
defy future court orders. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest impeachment news, court orders news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
presidential immunity rulingPolitico
•US Politics
US Politics
74% Informative
David Gergen : Does the Trump administration plan to ignore or defy future court orders that it disagrees with? He says the president is acutely aware of his own self-interests.
He says a confrontation between the courts would imperil the successful project by Republicans and conservatives to shift the Supreme Court .
Gergen says there are practical reasons for the administration to stay on the right side of the courts.
Julian Zelizer : Supreme Court sympathetic to conservative priorities is a huge boon to the right.
Trump administration is moving aggressively on many legal fronts to change the law and push the boundaries of executive power, he says.
Zelizer says it would be a bad idea for Trump and the GOP to rock this boat and lose their best opportunity in decades to fundamentally reshape the law.
VR Score
75
Informative language
71
Neutral language
48
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
61
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
31
Source diversity
16
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
Small business owner?
