Court Upholds Deportation Restraining Order
This is a news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Millett news.
Millett news
For more Millett news, you can click here:
more Millett newsNews about Us circuit and appeals courts
For more Us circuit and appeals courts news, you can click here:
more Us circuit and appeals courts newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us circuit and appeals courts, you might also like this article about
temporary restraining orders. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Circuit Judges Patricia Millett news, broader restraining order news, news about Us circuit and appeals courts, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
temporary restraining orderLaw & Crime
•US Politics
US Politics
'The government is mistaken': Appeals court strongly rubbishes Trump admin efforts to deport without due process, keeps lower court's restraining order in place
73% Informative
A federal court of appeals has upheld a temporary restraining that bars the government from summarily deporting immigrants without due process by citing an obscure wartime law.
The Trump administration claimed something not entirely unlike plenary authority to quickly deport immigrants using the Alien Enemies Act (AEA) of 1789 .
The law, which has not been used since World War II , has hitherto been understood to apply only during an actual war with another country.
Judge Millett says the lower court is equipped to deal with the case on the merits at this stage.
She also chided the government for what appeared to remove the case from the court’s jurisdiction by its actions.
Millett used especially strong language to take issue with the Trump administration's interpretation of the AEA .
VR Score
75
Informative language
73
Neutral language
35
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
64
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
7
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links
Small business owner?