This is a news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to NIH news.
For more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsFor more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
NIH funding. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest federal funding freezes news, funding pause news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
federal funding pauseGuardian
•US Politics
US Politics
78% Informative
NIH has stopped submitting study sections meetings in which scientists peer review NIH grant funding proposals to the Federal Register .
By law, study sections must appear on the register 15 days in advance of meetings.
This is a clear violation of federal judges’ orders, according to a law professor.
A scientist who was supposed to attend a postponed study section as a reviewer also had trouble making sense of these actions.
If the meetings are ever rescheduled, reviewers will either have forgotten details of the proposals they reviewed or have to spend extra time reviewing them again.
The NIH press office did not respond to a request for comment in time to be included in the story.
VR Score
77
Informative language
72
Neutral language
67
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
9
Source diversity
9
Affiliate links
no affiliate links