This is a AI news story, published by TechCrunch, that relates primarily to Kadrey v. Meta news.
For more AI news, you can click here:
more AI newsFor more Kadrey v. Meta news, you can click here:
more Kadrey v. Meta newsFor more Ai research news, you can click here:
more Ai research newsFor more news from TechCrunch, you can click here:
more news from TechCrunchOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai research, you might also like this article about
many AI copyright disputes. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest copyright infringement news, Meta employees news, news about Ai research, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
AI training data licensing talksTechCrunch
•Technology
Technology
84% Informative
Documents unsealed by plaintiffs in AI copyright case Kadrey v. Meta .
Defendants say training AI models on IP -protected works, particularly books, is fair use.
Documents show internal work chats between Meta staffers discussing using copyrighted works to train AI models.
In one chat, a Meta research engineer said “a gazillion” startups were probably already using pirated books for training.
In a work chat, Kambadur mentioned that Meta ’s AI team tuned models to “avoid IP risky prompts” The filings contain other revelations, implying that Meta may have scraped Reddit data for some type of model training.
The plaintiffs in Kadrey v. Meta have amended their complaint several times since the case was filed in the U.S. District Court in 2023 .
VR Score
82
Informative language
79
Neutral language
75
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
63
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
10
Source diversity
5
Affiliate links
no affiliate links