RCMP Officers' Lawyer Seeks Panel Removal
This is a Solven news story, published by vancouversun, that relates primarily to Ian Solven news.
Solven news
For more Solven news, you can click here:
more Solven newsIan Solven news
For more Ian Solven news, you can click here:
more Ian Solven newsNews about Us police misconduct
For more Us police misconduct news, you can click here:
more Us police misconduct newsvancouversun news
For more news from vancouversun, you can click here:
more news from vancouversunAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us police misconduct, you might also like this article about
RCMP officers. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest conduct hearing news, racist group chats news, news about Us police misconduct, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
RCMP membersvancouversun
•US Politics
US Politics
Three B.C. RCMP members seek recusal of conduct board over ’disparaging’ email
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/365cf/365cf9f7d5bbf0b329f8f7837b6c94fbeca7e8e3" alt="vancouversun"
59% Informative
An RCMP code of conduct hearing began Monday to determine whether Ian Solven , Philip Dick , and Mersad Mesbah committed discreditable conduct for comments made in private group chats.
Mesbah, Solven and Dick all deny allegations of workplace harassment.
Their lawyers say they want the hearing panel removed over the use of a “disparaging” term in an email.
VR Score
70
Informative language
72
Neutral language
69
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
65
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources