NIH Grants Cut by Trump
This is a news story, published by Huffington Post, that relates primarily to Katie Britt news.
Katie Britt news
For more Katie Britt news, you can click here:
more Katie Britt newsNews about health policy
For more health policy news, you can click here:
more health policy newsHuffington Post news
For more news from Huffington Post, you can click here:
more news from Huffington PostAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about health policy, you might also like this article about
federal research outlays. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Health grants news, National Institutes news, news about health policy, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
research institutionsHuffington Post
•Health
Health
Alabama Sen. Katie Britt says she's hearing from constituents worried about NIH cuts
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/9f331/9f331e49a846f7043ef850553090d760dbc482fa" alt="Huffington Post"
76% Informative
Sen. Katie Britt (R-Ala.) was asked about a major reduction in National Institutes of Health grants.
The change targets “indirect costs” and will, by the administration’s own estimate, reduce federal research outlays by $4 billion a year.
Among the institutions that would feel the impact is the University of Alabama at Birmingham's health system, which is the region's economic backbone.
VR Score
78
Informative language
81
Neutral language
62
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
63
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
21
Source diversity
15
Affiliate links
no affiliate links