NIH Ends Grants' Indirect Costs
This is a US news story, published by Ars Technica, that relates primarily to National Institutes of Health news.
US news
For more US news, you can click here:
more US newsNews about Us federal policies
For more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsArs Technica news
For more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:
more news from Ars TechnicaAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
different indirect cost rate. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest indirect cost rate news, indirect costs news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
indirect cost reimbursementArs Technica
•US Politics
US Politics
National Institutes of Health radically cuts support to universities
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/ab15f/ab15f85812b5a9453a9e2117adf71f5d57c3d5a9" alt="Ars Technica"
85% Informative
National Institutes of Health announced Friday that negotiated rates were ending.
Every existing grant, and all those funded in the future, will see indirect cost rate set to just 15 percent .
This will likely severely curtail biomedical research in the US .
The new policy is described in a supplemental guidance document that modifies the 2024 grant policy statement.
VR Score
89
Informative language
90
Neutral language
63
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
59
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links