Duffy Proposes Fuel Economy Review
This is a US news story, published by Engadget, that relates primarily to Sean Duffy news.
US news
For more US news, you can click here:
more US newsSean Duffy news
For more Sean Duffy news, you can click here:
more Sean Duffy newsclimate change news
For more climate change news, you can click here:
more climate change newsEngadget news
For more news from Engadget, you can click here:
more news from EngadgetAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like climate change news, you might also like this article about
fuel economy standards. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy news, climate change news, climate change news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
fuel efficiency standardsEngadget
•Science
Science
US Department of Transportation moves to cut fuel efficiency standards
73% Informative
Department of Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy sent a memo to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration calling for a review of fuel economy standards to align with President Donald Trump 's goals of promoting the use of oil, natural gas and biofuels.
Duffy claims that "artificially high" standards have made new cars prohibitively expensive for US buyers and could negatively impact the US auto industry.
VR Score
71
Informative language
68
Neutral language
46
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
77
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links