Trump's Birthright Citizenship Order Blocked
This is a Seattle news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Donald Trump news.
Seattle news
For more Seattle news, you can click here:
more Seattle newsDonald Trump news
For more Donald Trump news, you can click here:
more Donald Trump newsNews about civil rights activism
For more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
Native American birthright citizenship. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Supreme Court ruling news, Native American citizenship news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
birthright citizenshipSalon
•US Politics
US Politics
"Boggles my mind": Experts think Trump's "blatantly unconstitutional" order has a chance with SCOTUS
77% Informative
President Donald Trump ’s executive order was blocked by a federal judge in Seattle on Thursday .
The order is aimed at rolling back birthright citizenship for children born in the country to parents who are not legal permanent residents.
Constitutional lawyers say the administration's legal arguments against the order fall flat.
Experts say the ultimate strategy is likely to push the case through the courts.
The Supreme Court is in an interesting spot because it has to define where it stands in relation to Donald Trump’s revolution.
The question for the arch-conservatives on the Supreme Court becomes “do conservatives take history and tradition seriously in this case?” James Sample , a professor of law at Hofstra University , told Salon that “almost no scholars or constitutional lawyers, including very, very conservative thinkers, believe that this is constitutional or that it will succeed.
VR Score
79
Informative language
77
Neutral language
37
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
65
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
8
Source diversity
6
Affiliate links
no affiliate links