Congress Questions Wildfire Funding
This is a California news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Donald Trump news.
California news
For more California news, you can click here:
more California newsDonald Trump news
For more Donald Trump news, you can click here:
more Donald Trump newsNews about Us federal policies
For more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
fire costs. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest hazard mitigation costs news, federal debt news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
federal disasterABC4 Utah
•Lawmakers disagree about federal support for California wildfires
69% Informative
Some in Congress are questioning the president’s commitment to cover 100% of the cost for the time being.
Republicans say some responsibility should fall on California .
Democrats reject the idea of limiting aid or providing it with strings attached.
Congress likely won’t act until after President-elect Donald Trump is sworn in as president next week .
VR Score
69
Informative language
65
Neutral language
58
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
45
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links