Personal AI for Tasks
This is a news story, published by Wired, that relates primarily to Pattie Maes news.
Pattie Maes news
For more Pattie Maes news, you can click here:
more Pattie Maes newsNews about Ai research
For more Ai research news, you can click here:
more Ai research newsWired news
For more news from Wired, you can click here:
more news from WiredAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai research, you might also like this article about
personal AI agents. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest AI agent news, AI agents news, news about Ai research, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
personal AI agentWired
•In the 1990s, MIT professor Pattie Maes was skeptical about personal AI agents. Here’s how she thinks we’re likely already using them
60% Informative
The idea of AI agents, or God-forbid “agentic AI,” is the current buzzword du jour for every tech leader who’s trying to hype their recent investments.
The concept of an automated assistant dedicated to completing software tasks is far from a fresh idea.
MIT professor Pattie Maes says engineers are not spending enough time addressing the complexities of human-computer interactions.
We should show up as ourselves in online interactions. It’s increasingly all we have left..
VR Score
59
Informative language
61
Neutral language
34
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
53
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links