Laken Riley Act Powers States
This is a news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Supreme Court news.
News about Us federal policies
For more Us federal policies news, you can click here:
more Us federal policies newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal policies, you might also like this article about
immigration lawsuits. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Biden immigration policies Republicans news, federal lawsuits news, news about Us federal policies, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
immigration judgesCNN
•Senate immigration bill aims to overturn Supreme Court precedent in a sea change for legal system, experts say
76% Informative
The Laken Riley Act aims to overturn Supreme Court precedent and give states the ability to sue the federal government.
The bill has passed the House and is moving forward in the Senate with bipartisan support.
It would give states new authorities to sue to overturn decisions to release individual immigrants.
Some Democrats want changes to the bill before a final vote.
The bill authorizes state lawsuits to seek court-ordered visa bans against so-called “recalcitrant countries” that won’t accept an immigrant eligible for deportation in the state.
The stakes are especially high for the provisions authorizing state lawsuits.
If the bill ultimately becomes law, that provision, and possibly others, will likely be challenged in court.
VR Score
80
Informative language
79
Neutral language
50
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
68
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links