Polarized Endurance Training Debate
This is a news story, published by Home Page, that relates primarily to Muniz-Pumares news.
aerobics & cardio news
For more aerobics & cardio news, you can click here:
more aerobics & cardio newsHome Page news
For more news from Home Page, you can click here:
more news from Home PageAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like aerobics & cardio news, you might also like this article about
training intensity. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest training intensity distributions news, endurance sports news, aerobics & cardio news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
training intensity distributionHome Page
•The One Weird Trait That Separates Faster Marathoners from Slower Ones
72% Informative
Training intensity distribution is a fancy term for how much of your training time you spend going easy, medium, or hard.
Sub-2:30 runners ran 67 miles per week, about three times as much as those running slower than 4:30 and 60 percent more than even the sub-3:00 runners.
By far the best predictor of marathon time was how many miles a runner racked up.
A new study by Muniz-Pumares found that faster runners did more easy running than slower runners.
But the data doesn’t support the idea of avoiding the medium zone, which is too slow to give you the benefits of interval training but too hard to recover from if you’re running big miles.
VR Score
82
Informative language
86
Neutral language
31
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
40
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
5
Source diversity
5