Texas-Arizona State Playoff Controversy
This is a Texas news story, published by New York Post, that relates primarily to Melquan Stovall news.
Texas news
For more Texas news, you can click here:
more Texas newsMelquan Stovall news
For more Melquan Stovall news, you can click here:
more Melquan Stovall newsfootball news
For more football news, you can click here:
more football newsNew York Post news
For more news from New York Post, you can click here:
more news from New York PostAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best sport news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like football news, you might also like this article about
targeting. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest defenseless receiver news, field goal news, football news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Sun Devils quarterback Sam LeavittNew York Post
•Refs eviscerated for controversial non-targeting call in Texas-Arizona State CFP quarterfinal
64% Informative
Texas beat Arizona State 39-31 in double overtime in the College Football Playoff quarterfinal.
The game was tied at 24-24 when Arizona State wide receiver Melquan Stovall was hit by Texas ' Michael Taaffe on a helmet-to-helmet hit.
ESPN consulted rules expert Matt Austin , who seemed to think a case for targeting could be made.
Despite a review from officials, targeting was not called.
VR Score
61
Informative language
56
Neutral language
2
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
40
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
8
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links