This is a DfE news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Ms Phillipson news.
For more DfE news, you can click here:
more DfE newsFor more Ms Phillipson news, you can click here:
more Ms Phillipson newsFor more United kingdom politics news, you can click here:
more United kingdom politics newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best world news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about United kingdom politics, you might also like this article about
new free speech laws. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest academic freedom news, free speech laws news, news about United kingdom politics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
free speech legislationTelegraph
•
74% Informative
Bridget Phillipson received a briefing from DfE officials in July on how she could go about revoking new laws.
She took university sector by surprise when she announced on July 26 that she was shelving the Higher Education (Freedom of Speech ) Act.
Ms Phillipson said at the time that she had chosen to “stop” the flagship Tory legislation before it was due to be implemented on Aug 1 “in order to consider options, including its repeal”.
Ms Phillipson is understood to have been overwhelmed by the strength of feeling from academics.
She is now considering reinstating the Act in a stripped-down version of the Act.
The Free Speech Union claimed the move was unlawful by removing protections for certain protected groups.
The High Court has granted her permission to appeal the move.
VR Score
73
Informative language
69
Neutral language
36
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
63
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
11
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links