Publisher Reviews Race Science Papers

This is a Sear news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to Lynn news.

Sear news

For more Sear news, you can click here:

more Sear news

Lynn news

For more Lynn news, you can click here:

more Lynn news

biology news

For more biology news, you can click here:

more biology news

Guardian news

For more news from Guardian, you can click here:

more news from Guardian

About the Otherweb

Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like biology news, you might also like this article about

scientific racism ideology

. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest scientific racism movement news, national IQ research news, biology news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!

scientific racism

Guardian

•

Science

Publisher reviews national IQ research by British ‘race scientist’ Richard Lynn

Summary

Nutrition label

85% Informative

Prof Richard Lynn argued western civilisation was threatened by genetically inferior ethnic groups.

His national IQ’ dataset purports to show wide variations in IQ between different countries.

Academics who have evaluated his papers allege that Lynn , who died last year , systematically biased data to produce implausibly low IQ scores for sub-Saharan nations.

Elsevier confirms it has ordered a review of Lynn ’s research published in its journals.

In 2024 , scientists including Sear called on journals to retract Lynn ’s papers, warning that his database was continuing to be cited despite having been discredited.

The citations are found in endorsements and critiques of Lynn , but also in papers not directly related to intelligence.

Others argue that calls for retraction risk playing into claims of censorship.

VR Score

Informative language

Neutral language

Article tone

semi-formal

Language

English

Language complexity

Offensive language

not offensive