Court Upholds TikTok Ban Law
This is a news story, published by Ars Technica, that relates primarily to Donald Trump's news.
Donald Trump's news
For more Donald Trump's news, you can click here:
more Donald Trump's newsNews about Us circuit and appeals courts
For more Us circuit and appeals courts news, you can click here:
more Us circuit and appeals courts newsArs Technica news
For more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:
more news from Ars TechnicaAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us circuit and appeals courts, you might also like this article about
prior TikTok bans. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest TikTok news, Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act news, news about Us circuit and appeals courts, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
strong First Amendment defenseArs Technica
•TikTok’s two paths to avoid US ban: Beg SCOTUS or woo Trump
72% Informative
A federal appeals court upheld a federal law that could ban or force a sale of TikTok early next year .
The law takes effect January 19, 2025 , a day before Donald Trump's first day in office.
In siding against TikTok and its fans, the court's decision likely surprised some law professors who had warned earlier this year that TikTok had a strong First Amendment defense.
VR Score
74
Informative language
73
Neutral language
44
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
66
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
1
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links