This is a Spotify news story, published by Wired, that relates primarily to Lamar news.
For more Spotify news, you can click here:
more Spotify newsFor more Lamar news, you can click here:
more Lamar newsFor more music news, you can click here:
more music newsFor more news from Wired, you can click here:
more news from WiredOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best entertainment news, business news, world news, and much more. If you like music news, you might also like this article about
radio company Drake. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Kendrick Lamar news, placing Drake news, music news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
DrakeWired
•
65% Informative
Drake and Kendrick Lamar's ongoing feud hit new highs (or lows?) via a pair of court filings from Drake .
In the first filing, lawyers for Drake ’s company Frozen Moments accuse Lamar 's record label Universal Music Group of using several methods to increase plays on “ Not Like Us” They also allege UMG paid Apple to have Siri direct listeners to the track when they requested Certified Loverboy .
Drake has filed a petition for a recount in his rap feud with Lamar .
The rapper's " Not Like Us " has more than 900 million plays on Spotify .
It's unknown what will happen with the petitions filed by Drake ’s team, but it's more clear that his feud is about more than rap.
VR Score
41
Informative language
23
Neutral language
91
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
49
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
15
Source diversity
8
Affiliate links
no affiliate links