OpenAI Deletes Copyright Data
This is a OpenAI news story, published by Ars Technica, that relates primarily to The New York Times news.
OpenAI news
For more OpenAI news, you can click here:
more OpenAI newsNews about Ai research
For more Ai research news, you can click here:
more Ai research newsArs Technica news
For more news from Ars Technica, you can click here:
more news from Ars TechnicaAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai research, you might also like this article about
OpenAI data. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest copyright abuse news, damning searches news, news about Ai research, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
OpenAIArs Technica
•OpenAI blamed NYT for tech problem erasing evidence of copyright abuse
79% Informative
The New York Times accused AI company OpenAI of erasing programs and search results that the newspaper believed could be used as evidence of copyright abuse.
The NYT apparently spent more than 150 hours extracting training data, while following a model inspection protocol that OpenAI set up to avoid conducting potentially damning searches of its own database.
OpenAI denied deleting "any evidence," instead admitting only that file-system information was "inadvertently removed".
VR Score
81
Informative language
81
Neutral language
43
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
79
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
1
Affiliate links
no affiliate links