Spacex's Sonic Boom Risks Damage
This is a Spacex news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Kent Ghee news.
Spacex news
For more Spacex news, you can click here:
more Spacex newsKent Ghee news
For more Kent Ghee news, you can click here:
more Kent Ghee newsspace exploration news
For more space exploration news, you can click here:
more space exploration newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like space exploration news, you might also like this article about
Starship Sonic boom. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Sonic boom study news, Sonic boom news, space exploration news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Starship sound level
Amazon Web Services, Inc.
•Study suggests SpaceX Starship sonic boom impacts locals, Musk responds
54% Informative
Acoustics engineer Kent Ghee conducted a sound test and found that noise recorded 6 miles from Spacex 's South Texas launch site was the equivalent of standing 200 feet from a Boeing 747 plane during takeoff.
The data was based off a Starship test flight last month , testing the sound and air pressure it generated.
The FAA says modest property damage such as cracks and old windows can start to occur when pressurization levels hit 10 per square feet barefoot, but the FAA says it's unlikely until levels hit above 20 ..
VR Score
51
Informative language
47
Neutral language
15
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
42
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links