This is a news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Schedule F. * news.
For more Schedule F. * news, you can click here:
more Schedule F. * newsFor more labor activism news, you can click here:
more labor activism newsFor more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about labor activism, you might also like this article about
federal employees. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest federal personnel matters news, federal jobs news, news about labor activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
federal workforceThe Hill
•
76% Informative
President-elect Trump 's plan to reshape the federal workforce would allow him to fire wide swaths of career employees and replace them with political appointees.
It's sparking alarm among federal workers, who see it as a way to insert politics into government actions.
Trump allies have envisioned a massive expansion of the number of political positions, from 4,000 currently to about 50,000 .
Project 2025 lists the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) as an ideal department to “pilot-test a reinstated” Schedule F.
The idea pops up elsewhere in the nearly 1,000 -page document, including at the Environmental Protection Agency ( EPA ).
VR Score
78
Informative language
74
Neutral language
71
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
4
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links