Proposes abolishing Department of Transportation
This is a news story, published by Reason Magazine, that relates primarily to David Rothkopf news.
David Rothkopf news
For more David Rothkopf news, you can click here:
more David Rothkopf newsautomotive and transportation news
For more automotive and transportation news, you can click here:
more automotive and transportation newsReason Magazine news
For more news from Reason Magazine, you can click here:
more news from Reason MagazineAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like automotive and transportation news, you might also like this article about
federal government. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest state governments news, government department news, automotive and transportation news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
infrastructureReason Magazine
•Abolish the Department of Transportation
57% Informative
David Rothkopf : Of all the organs of the federal government, the Department of Transportation should be abolished.
He says it provides infrastructure grants to state and local governments, owns and operates the nation's outdated air traffic control system, regulates transportation, and regulates all modes of transportation.
Rothpf: It would be relatively straightforward to abolish the DOT and hand this function off to an independent federal agency.
VR Score
72
Informative language
78
Neutral language
30
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
57
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources