Project 2025: Ending Education Department
This is a news story, published by Reason Magazine, that relates primarily to David Rothkopf news.
David Rothkopf news
For more David Rothkopf news, you can click here:
more David Rothkopf newsNews about labor activism
For more labor activism news, you can click here:
more labor activism newsReason Magazine news
For more news from Reason Magazine, you can click here:
more news from Reason MagazineAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about labor activism, you might also like this article about
education department. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest National Education Association news, teachers unions news, news about labor activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
other major teachers unionReason Magazine
•Abolish the Department of Education
71% Informative
David Rothkopf : Project 2025 has revived discussion of ending the U.S. Department of Education .
He says eliminating the programs it administers, many of which predate the department, is just as important.
He notes the department became the K-12 controller that Shanker feared, peaking with the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) He says the Constitution gives the federal government no authority to govern education, but the feds need relatively little money to exert power.
VR Score
80
Informative language
84
Neutral language
14
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
61
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
15
Source diversity
12