Court Upholds CEQ's Regulations
This is a news story, published by The New Republic, that relates primarily to FAA news.
environmental science news
For more environmental science news, you can click here:
more environmental science newsThe New Republic news
For more news from The New Republic, you can click here:
more news from The New RepublicAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best science news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like environmental science news, you might also like this article about
CEQ regulations. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest federal regulations news, environmental policy news, environmental science news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
National Environmental Policy ActThe New Republic
•A Federal Court Just Upended Decades of Environmental Regulation
83% Informative
D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that federal agencies and courts have been misinterpreting a major environmental law for the last half-century .
The ruling casts doubt on whether a key White House agency can write binding regulations on environmental policy.
Congress enacted NEPA in 1969 after the environmentalist movement emerged as a major force in American politics.
The FAA had relied on CEQ regulations when adopting its current plan for air tours over the parks, the panel vacated the current plan and ordered it to start anew.
The FAA could appeal the ruling to be reviewed by the entire D.C. Circuit , where Democratic appointees hold a majority.
VR Score
87
Informative language
88
Neutral language
58
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
64
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
3
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links