This is a news story, published by Common Dreams, that relates primarily to House news.
For more nonprofit, charities, & fundraising news, you can click here:
more nonprofit, charities, & fundraising newsFor more news from Common Dreams, you can click here:
more news from Common DreamsOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like this article about nonprofit, charities, & fundraising, you might also like this article about
ACLU. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest nonprofit news outlet news, Tlaib news, news about nonprofit, charities, & fundraising, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
other DemocratsCommon Dreams
•
69% Informative
H.R. 9495 would let the Treasury secretary designate an organization as "terrorist-supporting" without any explanation or proof, and then end its 501(c)(3) status.
A version of the policy targeting nonprofits previously passed the Republican -held House in April but stalled in the Democrat -controlled Senate .
Members of Congress spoke out against the proposed attack on nonprofits both online and on the House floor.
Amnesty International USA : "This legislation would be seen for what it is, a play from the authoritarian leader's playbook" Amnesty International : "Members of Congress must recognize the danger posed and vote down this bill" Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change.
VR Score
71
Informative language
69
Neutral language
16
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
60
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
10
Source diversity
3
Affiliate links
no affiliate links