Multinationals Sell Low-Income Products
This is a Australia news story, published by The Hindu, that relates primarily to Nestle news.
Australia news
For more Australia news, you can click here:
more Australia newsNews about keto, paleo, vegan, mediterranean
For more keto, paleo, vegan, mediterranean news, you can click here:
more keto, paleo, vegan, mediterranean newsThe Hindu news
For more news from The Hindu, you can click here:
more news from The HinduAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about keto, paleo, vegan, mediterranean, you might also like this article about
healthier products. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Nutrition Initiative news, healthier choice news, news about keto, paleo, vegan, mediterranean, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Health Star Rating systemThe Hindu
•Food companies sell products that are less healthy in poorer countries, says report
79% Informative
Products sold by companies including Nestle , Pepsico and Unilever were assessed as part of a global index published by the Access to Nutrition Initiative (ATNI) The group found that across 30 companies, the products sold in low-income countries scored lower on a star rating system developed in Australia and New Zealand .
Danone was the best performer in the index.
VR Score
90
Informative language
97
Neutral language
62
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
46
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links