"The Big Short: Real Estate Fraud"

This is a America news story, published by Jacobin, that relates primarily to Harris news.

America news

For more America news, you can click here:

more America news

Harris news

For more Harris news, you can click here:

more Harris news

News about Us federal elections

For more Us federal elections news, you can click here:

more Us federal elections news

Jacobin news

For more news from Jacobin, you can click here:

more news from Jacobin

About the Otherweb

Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about

Harris campaign

. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest rich donors news, big donors news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!

Kamala Harris campaign

Jacobin

•

Corporate Donors Guided Kamala Harris to Defeat

Summary

Nutrition label

72% Informative

Julian Zelizer : A New York Times article about the influence of big donors over the Kamala Harris campaign was based on not-so-humble bragging from the heights of corporate America .

He says it reads much more like a confession that Harris 's campaign was more open to corporate input than Biden 's.

Zelizer says Harris signaled her intention to scrap parts of Biden 's economic agenda that benefited working-class Americans but went down with the very rich.

They were fine under Biden , they would have been fine under Harris , and they will certainly not suffer any real damage under Trump ’s presidency, even if they find him personally distasteful. The role they played in steering the Harris campaign onto the rocks, however, is one that everyone without the protective insulation of wealth should remember during the second Trump term..

VR Score

Informative language

Neutral language

Article tone

informal

Language

English

Language complexity

Offensive language

not offensive

Hate speech

not hateful