Wikipedia Recreates Trump-Fascism Article

This is a Wikipedia news story, published by Washington Examiner, that relates primarily to Guardian news.

Wikipedia news

For more Wikipedia news, you can click here:

more Wikipedia news

News about Us political corruption

For more Us political corruption news, you can click here:

more Us political corruption news

Washington Examiner news

For more news from Washington Examiner, you can click here:

more news from Washington Examiner

About the Otherweb

Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us political corruption, you might also like this article about

fascist

. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest fascists news, fascist government news, news about Us political corruption, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!

Fascism

Washington Examiner

•

Musk calls Wikipedia ‘broken’ after page resurfaces defining Trump as ‘fascist’ - Washington Examiner

Summary

Nutrition label

60% Informative

The article was created on Sept. 21, 2024 , the same day the Guardian published an essay titled, “Is Donald Trump a Fascist ?” The article also featured the Wikipedia page of “Trumpism,” the ideology and movement associated with Trump , which is described in hostile terms.

One editor who made up over half the edits removed the contributions of other editors who cast a more neutral angle, Rindsberg found.

“Fascism’ is almost entirely meaningless,” he wrote. “In conversation, of course, it is used even more wildly than in print.” Republicans and some Democrats have decried the rhetoric as a possible incitement to violence.

VR Score

Informative language

Neutral language

Article tone

formal

Language

English

Language complexity

Offensive language

offensive

Hate speech

not hateful