RSV Vaccines Effective, Lacking uptake
This is a US news story, published by ScienceDaily, that relates primarily to Vaccine news.
US news
For more US news, you can click here:
more US newsVaccine news
For more Vaccine news, you can click here:
more Vaccine newsNews about vaccine development
For more vaccine development news, you can click here:
more vaccine development newsScienceDaily news
For more news from ScienceDaily, you can click here:
more news from ScienceDailyAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about vaccine development, you might also like this article about
RSV vaccines. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest RSV vaccination news, RSV pneumonia news, news about vaccine development, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
RSV vaccineScienceDaily
•RSV vaccines effective, but more people need to get them
80% Informative
Only 24 percent of eligible US adults received the vaccine, compared to 50 percent for flu shots.
Better public awareness and improved vaccine access are needed to increase uptake.
RSV is a significant cause of severe respiratory illness among older adults, especially those with underlying health conditions.
Vaccine effectiveness was consistent across age groups, including those 75 and older, and immunocompromised individuals.
VR Score
91
Informative language
96
Neutral language
76
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
64
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links