Voters Accept Misinformation Despite Evidence
This is a news story, published by The Conversation, that relates primarily to David Rothkopf news.
David Rothkopf news
For more David Rothkopf news, you can click here:
more David Rothkopf newsNews about Us political corruption
For more Us political corruption news, you can click here:
more Us political corruption newsThe Conversation news
For more news from The Conversation, you can click here:
more news from The ConversationAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us political corruption, you might also like this article about
political statements. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest factual inaccuracy news, voter behavior news, news about Us political corruption, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
inaccurate statementsThe Conversation
•Voters’ ‘moral flexibility’ helps them defend politicians’ misinformation − if they believe the inaccurate info speaks to a larger truth
82% Informative
Many voters are willing to accept misinformation from political leaders even when they know it’s factually inaccurate.
David Rothkopf : Voters often recognize when their parties’ claims are not based on objective evidence.
He says they still respond positively if they believe these inaccurate statements evoke a deeper, more important “truth” He says findings suggest that misinformation survives due to voters’ “gullibility”.
VR Score
86
Informative language
87
Neutral language
32
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
73
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
11
Source diversity
10
Affiliate links
no affiliate links