Smart on Crime plagiarism scandal
This is a Wikipedia news story, published by Washington Examiner, that relates primarily to Christopher Rufo news.
Wikipedia news
For more Wikipedia news, you can click here:
more Wikipedia newsChristopher Rufo news
For more Christopher Rufo news, you can click here:
more Christopher Rufo newscelebrity news
For more celebrity news, you can click here:
more celebrity newsWashington Examiner news
For more news from Washington Examiner, you can click here:
more news from Washington ExaminerAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best entertainment news, business news, world news, and much more. If you like celebrity news, you might also like this article about
Crime plagiarism accusations. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest top Chronicle executives news, VP Lauren Hoffman news, celebrity news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Smart on CrimeWashington Examiner
•Publisher of Harris's book reacts to plagiarism allegations - Washington Examiner
65% Informative
Christopher Rufo highlighted on Monday at least a dozen portions of Smart on Crime that appear to have shown significant similarities to Wikipedia entries and reports.
The journalist said Harris 's publisher, Chronicle Books , “accidentally” revealed its strategy to respond to the plagiarism accusations to him later on Monday evening .
VR Score
52
Informative language
41
Neutral language
56
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
61
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
8
Source diversity
4
Affiliate links
no affiliate links