Vance Questions Harris' Speech Censorship
This is a news story, published by Reason Magazine, that relates primarily to Julian Zelizer news.
Julian Zelizer news
For more Julian Zelizer news, you can click here:
more Julian Zelizer newsNews about Us federal elections
For more Us federal elections news, you can click here:
more Us federal elections newsReason Magazine news
For more news from Reason Magazine, you can click here:
more news from Reason MagazineAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us federal elections, you might also like this article about
Vance. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest free speech news, presidential debate news, news about Us federal elections, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
government censorshipReason Magazine
•Neither Harris nor Trump is a friend of free speech
60% Informative
Julian Zelizer : Sen. J.D. Vance dodged question about whether Donald Trump lost 2020 bid for re-election.
He asked if Kamala Harris "censor Americans from speaking their mind" in the wake of the 2020 COVID situation, he says.
Zelizer says the vice president's disregard for freedom of speech and Walz 's misconceptions about the First Amendment is puzzling.
VR Score
70
Informative language
71
Neutral language
3
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
58
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
15
Source diversity
9