This is a Ohio news story, published by Law & Crime, that relates primarily to Donald Trump news.
For more Ohio news, you can click here:
more Ohio newsFor more Donald Trump news, you can click here:
more Donald Trump newsFor more civil rights activism news, you can click here:
more civil rights activism newsFor more news from Law & Crime, you can click here:
more news from Law & CrimeOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about civil rights activism, you might also like this article about
Clark County Prosecuting Attorney. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest prosecution news, en banc Clark County Municipal Court news, news about civil rights activism, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Haitian Bridge AllianceLaw & Crime
•74% Informative
An en banc Ohio court has declined to issue arrest warrants for Donald Trump and JD Vance over “eating the cats” rhetoric directed at Haitian immigrants.
The group accused the Republican ticket of political speech crimes in an affidavit that may not have been filed in “good faith,” the court said.
The court said the First Amendment was the key obstacle to establishing probable cause in the affidavit.
The concurrence said the affidavit did not establish probable cause when attempting to trace Trump and Vance ’s statements to 33 hoax bomb threats that followed.
The court also said it was reasonable to conclude the case may not have been brought in “good faith” and “is not meritorious” in the affidavit.
VR Score
72
Informative language
65
Neutral language
68
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
69
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
8
Source diversity
6
Affiliate links
no affiliate links