Trump's LawyersCite Fischer Case

This is a Fischer news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Donald Trump's news.

Fischer news

For more Fischer news, you can click here:

more Fischer news

Donald Trump's news

For more Donald Trump's news, you can click here:

more Donald Trump's news

News about SCOTUS

For more SCOTUS news, you can click here:

more SCOTUS news

MSN news

For more news from MSN, you can click here:

more news from MSN

About the Otherweb

Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about SCOTUS, you might also like this article about

obstruction charges

. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Washington indictment news, prosecution news, news about SCOTUS, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!

immunity ruling

MSNBC

•

Jack Smith’s immunity brief wasn’t the only important filing this week in Trump’s case

Summary

Nutrition label

73% Informative

Donald Trump's lawyers cite a recent Supreme Court ruling in Fischer v. U.S. v. Fischer case shows that the obstruction charge is meant for evidence tampering rather than rioting.

Two of Trump ’s four charges in his indictment involve two of the obstruction charges.

Trump has pleaded not guilty.

VR Score

Informative language

Neutral language

Article tone

formal

Language

English

Language complexity

Offensive language

not offensive