Big Tech Opposes KOSA Bill
This is a news story, published by New York Post, that relates primarily to House news.
tech giants news
For more tech giants news, you can click here:
more tech giants newsNew York Post news
For more news from New York Post, you can click here:
more news from New York PostAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like tech giants news, you might also like this article about
KOSA proponents. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest KOSA news, Responsible Social Media news, tech giants news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
troubling censorship billNew York Post
•Big Tech mounts ‘divide and conquer’ bid in Washington to kill Kids Online Safety Act: sources
70% Informative
KOSA would impose a legal “duty of care” to ensure social-media apps shield kids from sexual abuse, drug addiction and risky stunts that can cause injury or even death.
Critics say it’s a cynical attempt to protect their profits at the expense of minors.
Big Tech advocates are tailoring their message depending on which constituency they’re trying to influence.
Some Democrats slammed a decision to remove mental health harms such as anxiety and depression from the House bill’s version of duty of care, arguing the bill is much weaker than the version that passed the Senate .
The bill does not make any changes to Section 230 , the statute that shields tech firms from being held liable for the third -party posts on their platforms.
Critics say it would effectively empower unelected bureaucrats to police online content.
VR Score
69
Informative language
66
Neutral language
13
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
55
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
7
Affiliate links
no affiliate links