Newsom Vetoes AI Safety Bill
This is a news story, published by Los Angeles Times, that relates primarily to Gavin Newsom news.
Gavin Newsom news
For more Gavin Newsom news, you can click here:
more Gavin Newsom newsNews about Ai policy and regulations
For more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsLos Angeles Times news
For more news from Los Angeles Times, you can click here:
more news from Los Angeles TimesAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
artificial intelligence safety bill. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest AI safety news, safety plans news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
AI safety bill SBLos Angeles Times
•Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoes AI safety bill opposed by Silicon Valley
76% Informative
Gov. Gavin Newsom vetoes SB 1047 , an artificial intelligence safety bill that would have established requirements for developers of advanced AI models to create protocols aimed at preventing catastrophes.
The bill was fiercely debated in Silicon Valley , receiving support from the Center for AI safety, SpaceX Chief Executive Elon Musk and prominent AI researchers.
VR Score
77
Informative language
75
Neutral language
60
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
63
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links