California Bans Online Satire
This is a California news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to Gavin Newsom news.
California news
For more California news, you can click here:
more California newsGavin Newsom news
For more Gavin Newsom news, you can click here:
more Gavin Newsom newssocial media news
For more social media news, you can click here:
more social media newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like social media news, you might also like this article about
Election Disinformation. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest election content news, disinformation campaigns news, social media news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
deceptive contentThe Daily Caller
•California’s new content moderation bills could ruin online political satire forever, legal experts say
58% Informative
California Gov. Gavin Newsom signed a pair of content moderation bills last week .
The bills would allow Californians to sue creators and platforms for making or hosting “materially deceptive” election content on the internet.
One potential consequence of the legislation is it could ruin satire and political comedy.
Mr. Reagan told the Daily Caller the parody label was just a precaution as the video was “obviously a joke” The bill’s supporters say that widespread access to AI tools makes it too easy for bad actors to interfere with elections.
Experts argue the laws are overreaching, and that there are already laws in place to combat potential crimes.
He argued the solution to deepfakes and manipulated content is more free speech, not less. “That’s counter speech in action that shows that we can still identify and expose falsehoods when they arise. And as long as counter speech can still be an effective remedy, we shouldn’t, the government shouldn’t be rushing headlong into regulation that can do collateral damage to America ’s First Amendment rights,” Terr concluded..
VR Score
56
Informative language
54
Neutral language
40
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
49
Offensive language
offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
10
Source diversity
8
Affiliate links
no affiliate links