US Doubts Ukraine's Missile Strikes
This is a Russia news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to White House news.
Russia news
For more Russia news, you can click here:
more Russia newsNews about Us involvement in foreign conflicts
For more Us involvement in foreign conflicts news, you can click here:
more Us involvement in foreign conflicts newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, you might also like this article about
Russian targets. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest range missiles news, Ukrainian Armed Forces news, news about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Ukrainian strikesRBC - Ukraine
•US finds Ukraine's arguments for authorizing strikes deep into Russia unconvincing
63% Informative
White House and Pentagon say Ukraine 's request does not justify risk of escalation from Russia .
U.S. officials say that previous attacks on Crimea proved effective by forcing Russian forces to retreat.
European military and diplomats oppose this approach, arguing that strikes on Russia from greater distances could have a more substantial impact on the conflict.
VR Score
67
Informative language
66
Neutral language
40
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
65
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links