JD Vance's Pet Eating Hoax
This is a Ohio news story, published by Guardian, that relates primarily to JD Vance news.
Ohio news
For more Ohio news, you can click here:
more Ohio newsJD Vance news
For more JD Vance news, you can click here:
more JD Vance newsNews about Us political corruption
For more Us political corruption news, you can click here:
more Us political corruption newsGuardian news
For more news from Guardian, you can click here:
more news from GuardianAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us political corruption, you might also like this article about
Racist rhetoric. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Guardian US columnist writing news, JD Vance news, news about Us political corruption, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Vance spokespersonGuardian
•JD Vance is factually challenged – and morally deficit | Margaret Sullivan
51% Informative
JD Vance could have turned back from the story about Haitian immigrants eating pets in Ohio .
He could have disavowed it and tried to limit the harm, but he left the post up and Donald Trump immediately took it from there.
Vance 's rejection of the chance to take down his original post speaks volumes about how he and Trump operate, says Margaret Sullivan .
VR Score
54
Informative language
52
Neutral language
18
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
41
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links