Rep. Walberg Criticizes Meta's Response
This is a news story, published by CNBC, that relates primarily to Walberg news.
Walberg news
For more Walberg news, you can click here:
more Walberg newstech giants news
For more tech giants news, you can click here:
more tech giants newsCNBC news
For more news from CNBC, you can click here:
more news from CNBCAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like tech giants news, you might also like this article about
illicit drug ads. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest illicit drug advertisements news, Read Meta news, tech giants news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Meta executiveCNBC
•Meta offered 'unacceptable' response to concerns over illicit drug ads on Facebook and Instagram, congressman says
74% Informative
Rep. Tim Walberg (R-Mich.) slammed Meta for its response to a bipartisan group of lawmakers regarding illicit drug ads on Facebook and Instagram .
Walberg : "Meta's response not only ignores most of the questions posed in our letter, but also refuses to acknowledge that these illicit drug adverts were approved and monetized by Meta ," Walberg said in a statement.
The lawmakers intended the list of 15 questions to help determine the prevalence of illicit drug advertisements on Meta 's apps.
VR Score
75
Informative language
74
Neutral language
33
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
64
Offensive language
possibly offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
2
Source diversity
2
Affiliate links
no affiliate links