Groups' Judicial Review Rejected
This is a news story, published by The Architects’ Journal, that relates primarily to Beverley Lang news.
Beverley Lang news
For more Beverley Lang news, you can click here:
more Beverley Lang newsreal estate & housing news
For more real estate & housing news, you can click here:
more real estate & housing newsThe Architects’ Journal news
For more news from The Architects’ Journal, you can click here:
more news from The Architects’ JournalAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like real estate & housing news, you might also like this article about
Zero Carbon House Birmingham. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Birmingham City Council news, Birmingham Modernist Society news, real estate & housing news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
Ringway Centre buildingThe Architects’ Journal
•Court defeats for Birmingham and London anti-demolition campaigners
65% Informative
Justice Beverley Lang rejected leave for judicial review of local authority planning decisions.
The two separate groups oppose the schemes on heritage and carbon grounds and over the loss of existing 1960s structures.
As a result, no judicial reviews will be heard, paving the way for the projects to move forward, although the groups can still appeal.
VR Score
70
Informative language
72
Neutral language
21
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
61
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links