DOJ Seeks Google AI Strategy
This is a news story, published by Verge, that relates primarily to Amit Mehta news.
Amit Mehta news
For more Amit Mehta news, you can click here:
more Amit Mehta newstech giants news
For more tech giants news, you can click here:
more tech giants newsVerge news
For more news from Verge, you can click here:
more news from VergeAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like tech giants news, you might also like this article about
deals Google. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Google news, search product news, tech giants news, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
antitrust lawVerge
•The DOJ wants info on Google’s AI strategy to bust up its search monopoly
69% Informative
The Justice Department wants to learn more about Google ’s AI strategy in order to determine what kinds of changes it will ask for to resolve the antitrust case.
Judge Amit Mehta recently ruled in favor of the DOJ and agreed that Google is an illegal monopolist.
The parties still haven’t agreed on a timeline for the remedies phase, which will include another trial-like proceeding.
VR Score
77
Informative language
80
Neutral language
49
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links