Subpoena for Blinken's AfghanistanTestimony
This is a news story, published by PBS, that relates primarily to Michael McCaul news.
Michael McCaul news
For more Michael McCaul news, you can click here:
more Michael McCaul newsNews about Us involvement in foreign conflicts
For more Us involvement in foreign conflicts news, you can click here:
more Us involvement in foreign conflicts newsPBS news
For more news from PBS, you can click here:
more news from PBSAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best politics news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, you might also like this article about
Taliban crackdown. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Afghanistan Reconstruction news, Taliban forces news, news about Us involvement in foreign conflicts, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
AfghanistanPBS
•House GOP subpoenas Blinken to testify on U.S. withdrawal from Afghanistan
68% Informative
Rep. Michael McCaul , the chairman of the House Foreign Affairs Committee , sent a subpoena letter late Tuesday .
He ordered Secretary of State Antony Blinken to appear before the committee by Sept. 19 or face a contempt of Congress charge.
A State Department spokesman said Blinken is unable to testify on the dates proposed by the committee as he will be traveling for diplomatic work the majority of September .
VR Score
76
Informative language
78
Neutral language
42
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
72
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links