Australia U-turns on LGBTQ Census Questions
This is a Australia news story, published by Yahoo, that relates primarily to Jim Chalmers news.
Australia news
For more Australia news, you can click here:
more Australia newsJim Chalmers news
For more Jim Chalmers news, you can click here:
more Jim Chalmers newsNews about Australia business & economics
For more Australia business & economics news, you can click here:
more Australia business & economics newsYahoo news
For more news from Yahoo, you can click here:
more news from YahooAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best business news, entertainment news, world news, and much more. If you like this article about Australia business & economics, you might also like this article about
LGBTQ citizens. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest Equality Australia news, next census news, news about Australia business & economics, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
LGBTQ peopleAFP.com
•Australia census plan prompts LGTBQ boycott threat
66% Informative
Australia scrapes tentative plans to ask Australians about their sexual and gender identity in the 2026 census.
Finance minister Jim Chalmers says the decision was made to avoid an ugly and potentially divisive public debate.
But some have voiced anger at the U-turn, saying not being properly counted "would be deeply hurtful".
VR Score
78
Informative language
81
Neutral language
48
Article tone
informal
Language
English
Language complexity
46
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
short-lived
External references
no external sources
Source diversity
no sources
Affiliate links
no affiliate links