AI Risk Framework Gaps
This is a news story, published by MSN, that relates primarily to AI news.
News about Ai policy and regulations
For more Ai policy and regulations news, you can click here:
more Ai policy and regulations newsMSN news
For more news from MSN, you can click here:
more news from MSNAbout the Otherweb
Otherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best tech news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about Ai policy and regulations, you might also like this article about
AI risk literature. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest AI risks news, AI risk frameworks news, news about Ai policy and regulations, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
AI Risk RepositoryTechXplore
•Global AI adoption is outpacing risk understanding, researchers warn
90% Informative
A new analysis of AI -related risks finds significant gaps in our understanding of the risks posed by AI .
The most frequently addressed risk domains included "AI system safety, failures, and limitations" "Socioeconomic and environmental harms" ( 73% ) "Discrimination and toxicity" ( 71% ) "Privacy and security" ( 68% ) "Malicious actors and misuse" received comparatively less attention.
On average, frameworks mentioned just 34% of the 23 risk subdomains identified.
MIT 's AI Risk Repository is the first attempt to rigorously curate, analyze, and extract AI risk frameworks into a publicly accessible, comprehensive, extensible, and categorized risk database.
It is part of a larger effort to understand how we are responding to AI risks and to identify if there are gaps in our current approaches.
The repository is freely available online to download, copy and use.
VR Score
94
Informative language
98
Neutral language
34
Article tone
formal
Language
English
Language complexity
71
Offensive language
not offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
long-living
External references
11
Source diversity
9
Affiliate links
no affiliate links