This is a news story, published by MailOnline, that relates primarily to Jean Hébert news.
For more Jean Hébert news, you can click here:
more Jean Hébert newsFor more longevity news, you can click here:
more longevity newsFor more news from MailOnline, you can click here:
more news from MailOnlineOtherweb, Inc is a public benefit corporation, dedicated to improving the quality of news people consume. We are non-partisan, junk-free, and ad-free. We use artificial intelligence (AI) to remove junk from your news feed, and allow you to select the best health news, business news, entertainment news, and much more. If you like this article about longevity, you might also like this article about
functional brain tissue replacement. We are dedicated to bringing you the highest-quality news, junk-free and ad-free, about your favorite topics. Please come every day to read the latest stem cells news, mouse stem cells news, news about longevity, and other high-quality news about any topic that interests you. We are working hard to create the best news aggregator on the web, and to put you in control of your news feed - whether you choose to read the latest news through our website, our news app, or our daily newsletter - all free!
donor brain cellsMailOnline
•81% Informative
Geneticist Dr Jean Hébert has been awarded a $110 million NIH grant to develop a surgery that replaces damaged or aging brain cells with tissue from human embryos.
The procedure involves repairing the ailing brain tissue with 'neuronal' stem cells grown in labs.
Stem cells are 'blank, shape-shifting' cells that can transform into cells from any part of the body.
But others in the field believe the surgery is too severe for common use, and members of the public have called it 'diabolical'.
'If it can work, forget aging,' one medical doctor and biotech entrepreneur, Dr Justin Rebo , said. 'It would be useful for all kinds of neurodegenerative disease.'.
VR Score
82
Informative language
82
Neutral language
37
Article tone
semi-formal
Language
English
Language complexity
51
Offensive language
likely offensive
Hate speech
not hateful
Attention-grabbing headline
not detected
Known propaganda techniques
not detected
Time-value
medium-lived
External references
9
Source diversity
6
Affiliate links
no affiliate links